Fix new terminology#95
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes remove legacy resource types from a constant array in the Changes
Estimated code review effort2 (~20 minutes) Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
|
||
| // legacy | ||
| Resource::TYPE_DOCUMENT, | ||
| Resource::TYPE_ATTRIBUTE, | ||
| Resource::TYPE_COLLECTION, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Having these here just duplicates what were store in the migrations resources, we now the have fallbacks to handle existing migrations that reference these
Summary by CodeRabbit